Honest comparison

Blixt vs MASV

MASV is the closest thing Blixt has to a professional rival, and it is a good product: browser portals on both ends, SOC 2 / ISO 27001 / TPN paperwork, and a cloud that holds your delivery until the receiver shows up. The disagreement is architectural — and it shows up on the invoice.

Side by side

The short version, in one table.

MASVBlixt
Direct transfer, no middleman cloudNo — data moves through MASV’s cloudYes — peer to peer; relay only as a fallback
Pricing modelPay-as-you-go, ~$0.25/GB — 1 TB ≈ $250Flat $5–50/mo — 1 TB costs the same as 1 GB
Direct traffic meteredEvery gigabyte is billedNever — P2P traffic doesn’t cross our servers
Install required to receiveNo — browser portals for send and receiveApp on both ends for direct transfers; bCloud share links work in any browser
Receiver offline when you sendFine — the cloud buffers until they collect itDirect needs both ends online; bCloud can hold a copy if you opt in
Resume after a connection dropYesYes — missing chunks only, MAC-protected journal
Compliance certificationsSOC 2, ISO 27001, TPNNone yet — privacy is architectural: no server holds your file
Link aggregationOffered — as a paid add-onMulticonnect included from Basic ($5/mo)
Works offline / LAN · self-hostNo — it is a cloud serviceLAN mode with no server at all; self-host the signaling hub

Fair is fair

Where MASV is the better choice.

Genuinely better with MASV:
  • Nobody installs anything. Sending and receiving both happen in a browser portal — for a client you will never meet again, that is real friction removed. Blixt’s browser story covers receiving via bCloud share links; direct transfers need the app on both ends.
  • The paperwork exists today: SOC 2, ISO 27001, TPN. If your client’s procurement checklist requires the badge, MASV has it and we don’t yet — our privacy argument is architectural, not certified.
  • Store-and-forward. If your receiver is asleep in another timezone, MASV’s cloud holds the delivery until they wake up. A direct Blixt transfer needs both ends online — bCloud covers the gap only when you choose to use it.

Our case

Where Blixt wins.

Flat cost

The invoice doesn’t scale with the file

At ~$0.25/GB, one terabyte is roughly $250. A Blixt subscription is $5–50 a month, flat — move a terabyte a day and the number doesn’t change.

Not metered

Direct traffic is free traffic

P2P transfers never cross our servers, so there is nothing for us to meter. We charge for the software, not for your gigabytes.

LAN + self-host

Works where clouds can’t

Fully offline LAN mode for isolated networks, and a self-hosted signaling hub (blixtd --embed-signal) inside your own perimeter.

Included, not add-ons

Multiconnect and a CLI in the box

Link aggregation across selected NICs from the Basic plan — with actual gain determined by path diversity and shared bottlenecks — and a scriptable CLI in every download, free tier included.


Same class of work. A different bill.

Start now

Download, drop a file, compare six digits. First transfer in minutes.

Download free

Compare plans

Flat subscriptions from $0 to $50. Never a per-gigabyte bill.

See pricing

Keep comparing

Ten more honest match-ups, from WeTransfer to Aspera.

All comparisons